Berlin Tech Meetup: The Future of Relational Foundation Models, Systems, and Real-World Applications

Register now:

For Senior Staff ML Engineers

Can a foundation model replace your custom ML stack? Spoiler: it can.

The build-vs-buy math isn't just about cost. It's about accuracy. Your hand-built models flatten relational data, missing multi-hop signals. KumoRFM learns from that structure directly. It's also pre-trained on thousands of datasets your team has never seen, providing additional pattern knowledge that pushes accuracy 10-50% beyond XGBoost/LightGBM baselines on RelBench. And it compresses months of engineering into hours.

Book a demo and get a free trial of the full platform: research agent, fine-tune capabilities, and forward-deployed engineer support.

By submitting, you accept the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Why Senior Staff MLEs choose Kumo

Build vs. buy — the math is clear

You can evaluate every claim below against public benchmarks and your own data. No black-box vendor promises.

$50K–$1M

Cost per hand-built model

Each custom model ties up 2+ FTEs for months: feature engineering, pipeline development, deployment, monitoring. Kumo reduces the marginal cost of each new model to near zero.

RelBench

Open benchmark you can verify

KumoRFM is evaluated on Stanford's RelBench — 11 databases, 30 tasks. Results are public and reproducible. No black-box vendor claims.

Native

Snowflake & Databricks integration

Runs as a native app in your existing data platform. No data movement, no new infrastructure. Evaluate it in your environment with your data.

Loved by data scientists, ML engineers & CXOs at

Catalina Logo

In production today

Results from teams that made the switch

17x

Enterprise Customer

Went from 3 models in production to over 50 in a single quarter with the same team. Feature engineering eliminated, pipeline complexity reduced by 95%.

+7%
5.4x

Databricks

Lead-scoring models delivering dramatic improvement in conversion rates. Deployed in days instead of months, with zero feature engineering.

$100M+

DoorDash

Restaurant recommendations driving hundreds of millions in GMV. Expanded to notification reranking and send-time optimization using the same foundation.

The real question

You can build it. But should you?

Path 1 — Build custom pipelines: Your team can build custom ML pipelines, but each model consumes months of senior engineering time that could be spent on differentiated problems. Feature stores, training infrastructure, serving layers — you maintain all of it.

Path 2 — Try LLMs: LLMs are impressive for text but fundamentally the wrong architecture for structured relational prediction. They tokenize your tables as text, discarding the primary keys, foreign keys, and multi-hop relationships that encode your most valuable signals.

KumoRFM is purpose-built for relational databases — open methodology, benchmark-verified on Stanford's RelBench, and runs as a native app in your existing Snowflake or Databricks environment. No data movement. No new infrastructure. Evaluate it with your own data.

UsersOrdersEventsProductsKumoChurn scores0.93Lead rankingTop 5%LTV prediction$12,400

95%

Less data preparation

Feature engineering eliminated

10–50%

Accuracy improvement

Over traditional ML (RelBench)

20x

Faster time-to-value

From months per model to hours

55+

Use cases

Validated in production

Superhuman Prediction Accuracy

KumoRFM isn't limited to your data alone. Pre-trained on billions of relational patterns across diverse datasets and fine-tuned to your schema, it sees what no in-house model can. As per the SAP SALT benchmark.

LLM

GPT4 + AutoML

63%

PhD Data Scientist

Feature eng. + XGBoost

75%

KumoRFM

Relational Foundation Model

91%

17x

increase in models shipped per quarter

Beating internal XGBoost model on key metrics with far less data and features. We went from three models in production to over fifty in a single quarter, with the same team.

Matt Loskamp

GTM Data Science Leader, Enterprise Customer

Trusted by leading enterprises

From startups to enterprises, leading organizations rely on Kumo to deliver predictive insights at scale.

Peer-reviewed

Open research you can evaluate yourself

Kumo is built on 40+ peer-reviewed papers at NeurIPS, ICML, and KDD. The methodology is public and reproducible.

RFMZero-shotFine-tunedTransfer
ICML 2024

KumoRFM: A Relational Foundation Model for Predictive Analytics

K. Huang, M. Fey, J. Leskovec et al.

A foundation model for relational data - pre-trained across schemas, it delivers accurate predictions out of the box and improves with fine-tuning on your specific data.

Read paper
ABC
NeurIPS 2024

Relational Deep Learning: Graph Representation Learning on Relational Databases

M. Fey, W. Hu, K. Huang, J. Leskovec et al.

Introduces learning predictive models directly on relational databases, eliminating the feature engineering pipeline that has historically bottlenecked enterprise ML.

Read paper
T1T2T3T4T5+20+20+23+22+35BaselineKumo30 tasks
NeurIPS 2024 · Datasets Track

RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databases

J. Robinson, R. Miao, K. Huang et al.

An open benchmark for evaluating relational prediction methods across 11 databases and 30 tasks. Kumo consistently outperforms traditional ML baselines.

Read paper